Loading…
Loading…
Agreements become schedules, including the ones you did not expect.
The problem
A property lease is obvious. A capacity agreement, a colocation contract, a managed hardware arrangement, a logistics commitment: less so. Each may contain an identified asset you control. Finding those, splitting what is lease from what is service, and keeping both on schedule is the work.
Architecture
Activity enters on the left. A posted, traceable journal leaves on the right.
Property, equipment, capacity, logistics
Is there an asset you control
Allocation basis recorded
Including options and index resets
Measured on your policy inputs
Traceable to the agreement clause
The boundary
Native capability first, then where the platform hands the work back.
Handles natively
Hands back
Handles natively
Hands back
Scope
Worked example
Check the arithmetic. Source equals schedule equals journal equals ledger.
| Line | Amount | Treatment |
|---|---|---|
| Infrastructure capacity agreement | $1,800,000 | 36 months |
| Monthly consideration | $50,000 | 1,800,000 / 36 |
| Lease component | $1,080,000 | $30,000 per month |
| Non-lease component | $720,000 | $20,000 per month |
| Total components | $1,800,000 | Ties to consideration |
| Year 1 lease cost | $360,000 | 12 x 30,000 |
| DR | Lease expense | $30,000 |
| CR | Lease liability and ROU amortization | $30,000 |
We build and configure accounting systems. We do not provide accounting, audit, or tax advice. Your accounting policy is set by your accountants and tested by your auditors. We build the system that runs it.
Ready to see it against your process?
Walk through the schedule, the journal, and the evidence trail against your own process.